Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Myths About Duplicate Content

Duplicate Content – It’s No Big Deal – 3 Common Myths Exposed


Duplicate Content


Think about it. All the TV news, radio news, news papers, they all rely on duplicate content. Non of these companies can afford a staff to do all original content. But they give credit where credit is due. The internet is no different. Curated content is everywhere. And the vast majority of original content creators welcome the links back to their content because it helps them rank better.


So in this article from KISSmetrics they expose 3 myths about duplicate content:


3 Myths About Duplicate Content



The words “duplicate content penalty” strike fear in the hearts of marketers. People with no SEO experience use this phrase all the time. Most have never read Google’s guidelines on duplicate content. They just somehow assume that if something appears twice online, asteroids and locusts must be close behind.


This article is long overdue. Let’s bust some duplicate content myths.


 


Myth #1: Non-Original Content on Your Site Will Hurt Your Rankings across Your Domain


I have never seen any evidence that non-original content hurts a site’s ranking, except for one truly extreme case. Here’s what happened:


The day a new website went live, a very lazy PR firm copied the home page text and pasted it into a press release. They put it out on the wire services, immediately creating hundreds of versions of the home page content all over the web. Alarms went off at Google and the domain was manually blacklisted by a cranky Googler.


It was ugly. Since we were the web development company, we got blamed. We filed a reconsideration request and eventually the domain was re-indexed.


So what was the problem?


  • Volume: There were hundreds of instances of the same text

  • Timing: All the content appeared at the same time

  • Context: It was the homepage copy on a brand new domain

It’s easy to imagine how this got flagged as spam.


But this isn’t what people are talking about when they invoke the phrase “duplicate content.” They’re usually talking about 1,000 words on one page of a well-established site. It takes more than this to make red lights blink at Google.


Many sites, including some of the most popular blogs on the internet, frequently repost articles that first appeared somewhere else. They don’t expect this content to rank, but they also know it won’t hurt the credibility of their domain.


Myth #2: Scrapers Will Hurt Your Site


I know a blogger who carefully watches Google Webmaster Tools. When a scraper site copies one of his posts, he quickly disavows any links to his site. Clearly, he hasn’t read Google’s Duplicate Content Guidelines or the Guidelines for Disavows.


Ever seen the analytics for a big blog? Some sites get scraped ten times before breakfast. I’ve seen it in their trackback reports. Do you think they have a full-time team watching GWT and disavowing links all day? No. They don’t pay any attention to scrapers. They don’t fear duplicate content.


Scrapers don’t help or hurt you. Do you think that a little blog in Asia with no original writing and no visitors confuses Google? No. It just isn’t relevant.


Personally, I don’t mind scrapers one bit. They usually take the article verbatim, links and all. The fact that they take the links is a good reason to pay attention to internal linking. The links on the scraped version pass little or no authority, but you may get the occasional referral visit.


Read more — Source


 





Remember only the best content gets curated.




Myths About Duplicate Content

No comments:

Post a Comment